Psychology of the Young Athlete Aged 11–18 Years: Parental Emotional Support, Performance Pressure, Body Image, and Prevention of Disordered Eating by Ori Scott M.Sc. Nutrition, RD.A Narrative Review

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a period of rapid physical, neurocognitive, social, and emotional development. Young athletes experience these developmental challenges within an additional environment of competition, performance evaluation, selection, training demands, body-composition expectations, injury risk, and social comparison. Parents are among the most influential social agents in this environment. Their behavior may support autonomy, resilience, emotional regulation, healthy eating, and long-term sport participation, or may unintentionally contribute to anxiety, perfectionism, burnout, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating.

Objective: This narrative review examines the psychological needs of athletes aged 11–18 years, with particular emphasis on the role of parents in emotional support, motivational climate, responses to success and failure, body-related communication, eating-disorder prevention, recognition of disordered eating, and early identification of low energy availability and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S).

Methods: A narrative synthesis was conducted with priority given to PubMed-indexed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, prospective and longitudinal studies, and the International Olympic Committee consensus literature. Evidence concerning adolescent athletes was prioritized; broader adolescent literature was included where directly relevant to parental communication, body image, and eating-disorder prevention. Because study populations, sports, psychological instruments, and eating-disorder assessment methods differ substantially across studies, numerical findings are presented with their original populations and should not be interpreted as universally applicable prevalence estimates.

Results: A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis including 190 studies and 58,335 athletes reported a pooled prevalence of eating disorders or disordered eating of 20.0% (95% CI 17.0–23.0%), although estimates varied considerably according to assessment instrument. In elite youth athletes, reported disordered-eating caseness has ranged from 0–14% in males and 11–41% in females across studies. A systematic review of parental influence on youth-athlete motivation included 29 studies, 9,185 young athletes, and 2,191 parents and identified autonomy-supportive parenting, moderate involvement, positive parent-child relationships, and mastery/task-oriented climates as favorable approaches. Conversely, parental pressure and directive behavior have been associated with greater competitive anxiety. Parent weight-related communication is also relevant: in one study of 218 mother-daughter dyads, extreme weight-control behaviors were reported by 4.2% of girls whose parents never commented on their weight compared with 23.2% among girls whose parents commented frequently. Evidence does not establish parents as the cause of eating disorders, which are multifactorial conditions, but parental communication represents a potentially modifiable component of the adolescent athlete's psychosocial environment.

Conclusions: The principal parental task in youth sport is not technical coaching or constant performance evaluation. It is the provision of psychological safety, stable attachment, appropriate autonomy, practical support, and unconditional regard. Eating-disorder prevention should be considered an integral component of psychological safeguarding rather than a secondary nutrition issue. Parents should minimize appearance- and weight-centered communication, avoid equating performance with personal worth, recognize early behavioral and physiological warning signs, and obtain multidisciplinary professional assessment when concerns arise.

Keywords: adolescent athlete; youth sport; parents; sports psychology; disordered eating; eating disorders; body image; parental pressure; burnout; RED-S; low energy availability; psychological safety.

1. Introduction

Participation in organized sport during adolescence can provide substantial psychological and social benefits, including enjoyment, competence, social belonging, self-efficacy, identity development, and opportunities for learning persistence and emotional regulation. These benefits, however, are not automatic consequences of sport participation. The psychological outcome depends substantially on the environment in which sport occurs.

Between approximately 11 and 18 years of age, young people are simultaneously managing puberty, changing body composition, developing identity, increasing independence, peer comparison, academic demands, emerging romantic and social relationships, and greater sensitivity to evaluation. Competitive athletes experience additional demands: selection and deselection, rankings, public results, coaching feedback, injury, return-to-play decisions, travel, intensive training schedules, and in some sports explicit or implicit expectations regarding body mass or appearance.

For this reason, an adolescent athlete should not be conceptualized simply as a smaller adult athlete.

Parents remain among the most important social influences throughout this developmental period. A systematic review evaluating parental influence on motivation in young athletes identified 29 eligible studies involving 9,185 athletes and 2,191 parents. The review concluded that positive parental goals and values, autonomy-supportive parenting, moderate involvement, positive parent-child relationships, and a parent-created task-oriented motivational climate were the most consistently favorable parental characteristics [1].

The implication is fundamental: parental involvement is not inherently beneficial or harmful. How parents are involved is more important than simply whether they are involved.

The central message of this review is therefore:

Do not judge the young athlete; support the developing person.

This principle is particularly important in relation to eating disorders, body image, performance pressure, and body-composition expectations. Eating-disorder prevention should be understood as part of psychological safeguarding in youth sport rather than being relegated to sports nutrition alone.

2. Scope and Methodological Approach

This article is a narrative review rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis. Evidence was selected to address four connected clinical and practical domains: parental influence on motivation and emotional development; parental pressure and athlete anxiety/burnout; body image and weight-related communication; and prevention and early recognition of eating disorders, disordered eating, low energy availability, and RED-S.

Priority was given to PubMed-indexed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, longitudinal studies, prospective studies, and International Olympic Committee consensus documents.

Quantitative findings require particular caution. Youth-sport studies differ in age, sex distribution, sport type, competition level, cultural context, and measurement tools. Eating-disorder studies additionally distinguish between formal psychiatric diagnoses, clinical interviews, questionnaire-defined disordered eating, and screening-test thresholds. These outcomes are related but not equivalent.

Accordingly, the present review uses statistics to describe the evidence rather than to claim a single universal prevalence for all athletes aged 11–18 years.

3. Adolescence, Athletic Identity, and Psychological Vulnerability

During adolescence, acceptance by significant adults and peers becomes highly salient while self-concept remains under development. For the young athlete, athletic performance can become disproportionately influential in self-definition.

A healthy athletic identity can create meaning, belonging, discipline, and competence. Problems may arise when identity becomes excessively narrow:

“I participate in sport” can gradually become “I am only valuable when I perform well.”

This distinction becomes especially important in high-performance pathways.

A recent scoping review of elite youth-athlete mental health found that disordered eating was the most frequently investigated mental-health concern among included research, appearing in 16 studies, compared with seven investigating anxiety and five investigating depression. Reported disordered-eating caseness ranged from 0–14% among males and 11–41% among females. The authors emphasized substantial heterogeneity and limitations in the available evidence rather than interpreting these ranges as universal prevalence rates [2].

Parents can serve as an important counterweight to performance-contingent identity by communicating repeatedly that athletic results are information about performance—not measures of human worth.

A psychologically protective family communicates, implicitly and explicitly:

Your performance may be evaluated. Your worth is not being evaluated.

4. Parents as Regulators of the Youth-Sport Environment

Parents influence youth sport through several interconnected channels. They provide transportation, money, food, scheduling, medical access, equipment, and competition attendance, but they also influence how the child interprets success, failure, coaching feedback, injury, body changes, and selection decisions.

The systematic review by Gao et al. found that supportive motivational environments were characterized particularly by autonomy support, positive parent-child relationships, task-oriented climates, and moderate rather than excessive involvement [1].

Autonomy support does not mean lack of parental boundaries. It means allowing progressively age-appropriate ownership of the athletic experience.

An autonomy-supportive parent may ask what the athlete learned, how the athlete felt, or what support is needed.

A controlling parent is more likely to dictate what the athlete should feel, what result is acceptable, how the athlete should train, or what body the athlete should have.

The distinction becomes critical because adolescence is partly the developmental process through which the young person moves from externally regulated behavior toward mature self-regulation.

5. “Do Not Judge, Just Support”: What This Means Scientifically

“Do not judge” does not mean parents should ignore unsafe behavior, lack of commitment, dishonesty, or medical risk. Nor does it mean that every competition should be described as successful.

It refers instead to avoiding global personal judgment based on performance.

There is an important psychological difference between:

“You made several tactical mistakes today.”

and

“You were terrible today.”

Likewise:

“You seemed under-fueled and exhausted; I am concerned.”

is fundamentally different from:

“You are eating too much and getting heavy.”

Constructive feedback addresses a behavior or situation. Judgment converts an outcome into a statement about identity.

Parents should therefore distinguish among three separate domains:

Domain	Appropriate parental response	Response to avoid
Performance	Curiosity, listening, perspective	Anger, humiliation, technical interrogation
Behavior	Clear boundaries and proportionate consequences	Global character judgment
Body/weight	Health, function, fueling and medical support	Teasing, criticism, comparison, dieting pressure

Parental warmth and performance standards are not mutually exclusive. Parents can expect responsibility, honesty, recovery, school engagement, respect for coaches and teammates, and appropriate effort without conditioning affection on winning.

6. Parental Pressure and Competitive Anxiety

Competition naturally produces physiological and psychological arousal. The objective is not to eliminate all precompetitive anxiety; moderate activation can be adaptive. The problem occurs when competition is interpreted as a threat to approval, belonging, or identity.

Bois et al. studied 341 young basketball and tennis athletes before official competition. Directive parental behaviors and pressure were positively associated with precompetitive anxiety among tennis players, while praise and understanding were negatively associated with anxiety among female tennis players [3].

Recent evidence has continued to identify similar relationships. In a study of 420 adolescent tennis players, parental expectations significantly predicted competitive state anxiety (B=0.111, p<0.01), while higher expectations were associated with lower perceived competence (β=-0.18, p=0.005) [4].

A separate 2026 sample of 492 junior tennis athletes likewise found that parental expectations predicted precompetitive anxiety (β=0.153, p=0.001) and negatively predicted psychological-needs satisfaction (β=-0.147, p=0.010). Perceived competence emerged as an important partial mediator [5].

These studies are observational and do not demonstrate that parental expectations alone cause anxiety. Nevertheless, their direction is consistent with broader motivational theory: when athletes perceive achievement as necessary to maintain approval or demonstrate personal worth, competition becomes psychologically more threatening.

7. Failure, Mistakes, and the Development of Resilience

Young athletes require exposure to manageable failure. Resilience is not developed by preventing every disappointment, nor by criticizing disappointment until the athlete “becomes tougher.”

It develops when the athlete experiences difficulty in an environment that remains psychologically safe.

Following a poor performance, parents often feel compelled to explain the technical errors, identify insufficient effort, or motivate immediate improvement. Yet the period immediately following competition is frequently a poor time for parental technical analysis.

The athlete may already be processing disappointment, embarrassment, fatigue, coach feedback, teammate reactions, and self-criticism.

The parent's first responsibility is emotional regulation, not tactical correction.

A useful principle is:

Coach coaches. Athlete competes. Parent parents.

Unless the parent is formally acting as the child's coach, technical evaluation is generally best left to appropriately qualified coaching staff.

The parent's unique role is more difficult to replace: providing a stable relationship that does not disappear after defeat.

8. Burnout and Excessive Sport Demands

Athlete burnout is commonly described through emotional/physical exhaustion, reduced sense of accomplishment, and sport devaluation.

Sport specialization is not equivalent to burnout, but highly specialized sporting environments may increase exposure to repetitive demands, pressure, limited recovery, and narrowed identity.

A systematic review and meta-analysis by Giusti et al. included eight studies and 1,429 adolescent athletes with a mean age of 15.59 years. Compared with sport samplers, specializing athletes reported significantly greater reduced accomplishment (mean difference 0.87; 95% CI 0.67–1.08), exhaustion (0.46; 95% CI 0.24–0.68), and sport devaluation (0.41; 95% CI 0.22–0.60) [6].

The evidence does not imply that every specialized athlete will burn out. The meta-analysis itself contained many more specialized athletes than samplers, illustrating limitations of the available literature.

Nevertheless, parents should be alert when sport progressively displaces sleep, school functioning, friendships, family life, recovery, and non-sport identity.

The goal of a developmental sport pathway is not merely to maximize performance at age 13 or 14. It is to preserve the physical and psychological capacity to develop over years.

9. Eating Disorders Must Be a Core Youth-Sport Psychology Issue

Eating disorders in athletes should not be treated simply as failures of nutrition knowledge.

An eating disorder is a mental-health disorder with nutritional, psychological, behavioral, medical, and social dimensions. Disordered eating describes a broader spectrum of maladaptive behaviors and cognitions that may not meet formal diagnostic criteria.

These can include restrictive eating, persistent dieting, compulsive food rules, binge eating, purging, fasting, misuse of weight-control methods, or excessive exercise undertaken specifically to compensate for food intake.

The most comprehensive recent athlete meta-analysis provides an important indication of scale. Nasser et al. identified 1,582 records and included 190 studies involving 58,335 athletes in their systematic review; 127 high-quality studies containing 43,006 athletes entered the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of eating disorders or disordered eating was 20.0% (95% CI 17.0–23.0%) [7].

Measurement method mattered substantially. The Eating Disorder Examination produced a pooled estimate of 11.9%, whereas studies using the Eating Disorder Inventory produced an estimate of 28.3% [7].

This approximately one-in-five estimate should therefore not be interpreted as indicating that one in five adolescent athletes has a clinically diagnosed eating disorder. The analysis combined ages and training levels and included both ED and DE outcomes.

Youth-specific evidence reinforces the need for caution.

A scoping review of elite youth athletes included 21 studies and concluded that elite youth athletes represent an at-risk population, particularly females and athletes participating in sports emphasizing leanness. Where clinical interviews were used, eating-disorder prevalence tended to be higher in elite youth athletes than in general youth comparison groups. However, the literature was dominated by female, European, and cross-sectional samples [8].

10. What Youth-Specific Studies Tell Us

A well-known Norwegian two-phase study evaluated first-year students from 16 elite sport high schools and comparison schools. The estimated prevalence of eating disorders was 7.0% among athletes compared with 2.3% among controls (p=0.001). Among athletes, prevalence was substantially higher in females than males: 14.0% versus 3.2% [9].

However, newer findings illustrate why simplistic statements such as “athletes always have more eating disorders than non-athletes” should be avoided.

A prospective controlled study involving 1,186 high-school participants at baseline found diagnosed ED prevalences of 6.9% in male elite athletes, 5.9% in male trained athletes, and 3.0% in male controls; corresponding female estimates were 9.3%, 11.2%, and 11.9%. Between-group differences were not statistically significant [10].

Taken together, these findings demonstrate that risk is heterogeneous.

Sex, sport culture, leanness pressures, body image, developmental stage, coaching practices, perfectionism, social environment, screening methodology, and individual vulnerabilities all matter.

There is therefore no defensible single percentage that describes the eating-disorder risk of every 11–18-year-old athlete.

11. Parents Do Not “Cause” Eating Disorders

This point is essential both scientifically and ethically.

Eating disorders are multifactorial psychiatric disorders. Their development reflects interactions among biological susceptibility, psychological traits, sociocultural influences, developmental factors, interpersonal experiences, and, in athletes, sport-specific pressures.

Parents should therefore never be described as the cause of an adolescent's eating disorder.

At the same time, this does not mean that the family environment is irrelevant.

A rapid scoping review of 16 studies evaluating parenting styles and disordered eating in youth found associations between disordered-eating symptoms and adverse parenting patterns characterized by high control and low responsiveness. The review emphasized that associations were frequently indirect and that methodological heterogeneity prevents simple causal conclusions [11].

The clinically useful message is therefore not parental blame.

It is parental opportunity.

Communication, modeling, emotional safety, early recognition, and willingness to obtain treatment are modifiable.

12. Weight Talk: A Modifiable Family Risk Environment

One of the most actionable findings in the literature involves parental communication about weight.

Neumark-Sztainer et al. reported that, among adolescent girls in their study, 45% said their mothers encouraged them to diet and 58% reported weight teasing by family members. Weight teasing was strongly associated with body dissatisfaction, unhealthy and extreme weight-control behaviors, and binge eating. Importantly, family weight-talk and dieting variables were not associated with better outcomes [12].

Another investigation involving 218 mother-adolescent-daughter dyads found a striking gradient.

Among girls whose parents never commented on their weight, 4.2% reported extreme weight-control behavior.

Among girls whose parents frequently commented on their weight, the prevalence was 23.2%.

Frequent parental comments about daughters' weight were statistically associated with depressive symptoms (p=0.041), extreme weight-control behaviors (p=0.040), and binge eating (p=0.048), even after adjustment for demographic variables and standardized BMI [13].

These data are observational and therefore cannot prove that comments caused the behaviors. Nevertheless, a roughly fivefold difference in reported extreme weight-control behavior across these exposure groups is clinically difficult to ignore.

13. Even “Positive” Body Comments Require Caution

Parents may reasonably assume that positive comments about appearance are harmless.

The evidence suggests greater nuance.

A longitudinal cohort study involving 2,056 adolescents examined parental positive and negative comments about weight, shape, and eating and subsequent psychological and eating-related outcomes. Negative comments appeared particularly relevant, but associations with ostensibly positive comments were complex and depended on the parent, topic, and outcome [14].

Similarly, research examining parental weight communication has found poorer adolescent health and well-being associated with more frequent negative weight-related comments. Associations were observed for both maternal and paternal communication [15].

For parents of athletes, this suggests a useful preventive principle:

Reduce the centrality of body weight and shape in family communication altogether.

Rather than:

“You look so thin and fit.”

consider emphasizing:

“You seem strong.”

“You recovered well.”

“You looked energetic.”

“You handled that difficult match with composure.”

“I enjoyed watching you compete.”

The goal is to move praise from appearance toward function, behavior, character, learning, and experience.

14. Eating-Disorder Prevention Begins Before Symptoms Appear

Prevention should not begin only when the adolescent starts losing weight.

By then, behavioral and cognitive changes may already be established.

Parents can influence several dimensions of the home environment before pathology appears: how adults speak about their own bodies, how food is described, whether weight loss is praised, whether certain foods are moralized as “good” or “bad,” how weight gain during puberty is interpreted, whether the child is compared with teammates or siblings, and whether athletic selection is attributed primarily to body shape.

This concept is supported by prevention literature beyond sport.

Hart et al. systematically reviewed 20 parent-involving interventions designed to prevent body dissatisfaction or eating disorders. Among four higher-quality studies providing the strongest relevant evidence, two showed significantly improved child outcomes when parents were involved [16].

The evidence base was relatively small, meaning that parent interventions cannot yet be presented as a guaranteed preventive strategy.

Nevertheless, prevention research supports treating parents as relevant participants rather than peripheral observers.

A 2026 scoping review of adolescent eating-disorder prevention likewise identified prevention as an important psychosocial intervention domain and emphasized the continued need for rigorous development of preventive strategies across adolescent contexts [17].

15. Sport-Specific Body Pressure

Some sports may expose adolescents to more frequent discussion of body mass or physique because of weight categories, aesthetic evaluation, endurance traditions, power-to-mass assumptions, uniforms, or culturally established beliefs regarding “ideal” competitive bodies.

Even when body composition genuinely has performance relevance, adolescents require particular protection.

Puberty naturally changes body mass, fat mass, lean mass, skeletal structure, hormonal environment, and energy requirements. Attempts to resist normal development through aggressive dietary restriction may create significant health and psychological consequences.

Parents should therefore avoid independently imposing calorie restriction, weight-loss targets, fasting strategies, dehydration, or physique goals on minors.

Where body composition has a legitimate clinical or performance relevance, assessment should be individualized and led by appropriately trained professionals within an interdisciplinary athlete-health framework.

16. Eating Disorders, Disordered Eating, Low Energy Availability, and RED-S Are Related but Not Identical

These terms should not be used interchangeably.

Eating disorders are psychiatric diagnoses.

Disordered eating describes maladaptive eating attitudes and behaviors that may occur with or without a formal diagnosis.

Low energy availability (LEA) occurs when energy intake is insufficient relative to exercise expenditure to adequately support physiological functions.

Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) describes adverse health and performance consequences associated with problematic low energy availability.

LEA can occur intentionally—for example through restrictive dieting—or unintentionally when a rapidly growing athlete simply fails to consume enough energy for growth plus intensive training.

Therefore:

Not every athlete with RED-S has an eating disorder.

And:

Not every athlete with an eating disorder will initially present as obviously underweight.

The 2023 IOC consensus on RED-S synthesizes more than 170 original publications produced since its previous consensus update and emphasizes the complex interaction between low energy availability, health, performance, and mental health [18].

A dedicated IOC review on mental health and RED-S identified mood changes, fatigue, and psychological conflict among possible early psychological indicators associated with problematic LEA, with more severe presentations associated with reduced well-being, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and eating disorders [19].

17. Why RED-S Is Especially Important in Adolescence

Adolescents must fuel more than training.

They must also fuel growth.

A practical review focused specifically on adolescents describes potential consequences of RED-S involving mental well-being, skeletal health, endocrine function, metabolism, menstruation, injury, stress, anxiety, low mood, and sporting underperformance [20].

Families therefore should not regard persistent fatigue, repeated injuries, menstrual disturbance, mood deterioration, or falling performance merely as evidence that the young athlete needs to “train harder.”

They can represent warning signs requiring assessment.

The traditional stereotype that RED-S is a problem only for thin female endurance athletes is incorrect. The contemporary model applies to athletes of all genders, although clinical presentation and risk markers can differ.

18. Menstrual Health Is a Health Indicator, Not an Athletic Inconvenience

For post-menarcheal female adolescents, persistent menstrual irregularity or loss of menstruation should not automatically be normalized as a consequence of serious training.

Menstrual disturbance can have multiple causes, and diagnosis requires medical evaluation, but energy deficiency is an important consideration in athletes.

Parents should avoid celebrating loss of menstruation as evidence of becoming “fit,” “lean,” or “serious.”

Likewise, restoration of menstruation should not be framed negatively as unwanted weight gain.

The correct response is clinical evaluation and attention to growth, energy availability, endocrine health, nutrition, skeletal health, and psychological factors.

19. The Male Athlete Must Not Be Missed

Eating disorders and RED-S occur in males.

Male presentations may be missed because concerns can center not only on thinness but also on muscularity, leanness, “clean eating,” body-fat reduction, or compulsive exercise.

A male adolescent athlete may therefore have clinically concerning behaviors while appearing strong, muscular, or high-performing.

Parents should be alert to rigid eating patterns, distress around missed training, compulsive exercise, sudden elimination of food groups, escalating supplement use, persistent dissatisfaction with muscularity, or preoccupation with achieving an extremely lean physique.

Screening methods themselves also present limitations. A systematic review of LEA/RED-S questionnaires identified 13 questionnaires across 33 studies and noted significant sex-specific limitations in available screening instruments, underscoring that assessment should not be reduced to a single questionnaire score [21].

20. Warning Signs Parents Should Recognize

Early eating disorders do not always look dramatic.

Weight can remain within an apparently “normal” range. Athletic performance may remain high temporarily. An adolescent can appear disciplined while pathology becomes progressively more rigid.

Parents should be particularly attentive when several changes begin to cluster.

Domain	Potential warning signs
Eating behavior	Skipping meals; progressively smaller portions; rigid food rules; unexplained elimination of foods; fasting; avoiding team meals; anxiety when planned foods are unavailable
Psychological	Increasing guilt after eating; fear of weight gain; excessive body dissatisfaction; irritability; anxiety; withdrawal; perfectionistic rigidity
Body-focused behavior	Frequent weighing; mirror/body checking; repeated comparison with teammates; fixation on body fat, leanness, muscularity, or “making weight”
Exercise	Secret extra training; exercise despite injury or illness; inability to tolerate rest; compensatory exercise after eating
Medical/physical	Persistent fatigue; dizziness; feeling unusually cold; recurrent illness; repeated injuries; bone-stress injury; gastrointestinal complaints
Reproductive/endocrine	Menstrual irregularity or amenorrhea; delayed or disrupted pubertal development requiring assessment
Performance	Unexpected plateau or decline; poor recovery; reduced strength/endurance; impaired concentration
Social	Withdrawal from family meals, restaurants, travel meals, celebrations, or peers because of food

No single sign establishes an eating-disorder diagnosis.

A pattern of changes should prompt concern.

21. Why Parents Should Not Wait for Severe Weight Loss

One of the most dangerous misconceptions is that an eating disorder becomes clinically significant only when an athlete appears extremely thin.

This is false.

Eating pathology can occur across body sizes, and low energy availability can produce adverse physiological effects before a dramatic visual transformation is obvious.

In addition, athletic culture may temporarily reinforce pathological behavior because early restriction can occasionally coincide with perceived changes in body composition or performance.

This creates a dangerous feedback loop:

restriction → short-term perceived reward → more restriction → physiological/psychological impairment.

Parents should therefore respond to behavioral change and clinical signs, rather than waiting for a specific body weight.

22. How a Parent Should Approach a Concern

The conversation should begin with observation and concern rather than accusation.

Instead of focusing on weight, parents should describe what they have actually observed.

For example, the core communication structure is:

Observation → concern → listening → professional help.

“I've noticed that eating before training has become stressful for you, you're doing extra sessions even when you're exhausted, and you seem worried whenever your weight changes. I'm concerned about how you're feeling and about your health. I want to understand what this is like for you, and I think we should get appropriate help.”

This approach does not require the parent to diagnose anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, ARFID, RED-S, or any other condition.

Diagnosis is not the parent's job.

Recognition and access to care are.

23. Multidisciplinary Assessment

Where eating-disorder or RED-S concerns exist, assessment should ideally involve professionals experienced with adolescents and athletes.

Depending on presentation, this may include a physician with adolescent/sports-medicine expertise, a registered sports dietitian experienced in eating disorders, and a psychologist or other qualified mental-health professional with appropriate eating-disorder expertise.

The precise team depends on the clinical situation.

Mental-health symptoms, medical instability, purging, fainting, cardiac symptoms, severe restriction, suicidality, rapid deterioration, or other acute concerns require prompt medical/mental-health assessment rather than routine sport-nutrition advice.

The parent's responsibility is to facilitate care—not to become the dietitian, psychotherapist, or physician.

24. Practical Guidelines for Parents of Athletes Aged 11–18

1. Separate love from performance. Never make warmth, approval, or family atmosphere contingent on winning, ranking, selection, body composition, or scholarships.

2. Listen before analyzing. After competition, determine whether the athlete wants comfort, space, food, rest, or discussion before offering technical opinions.

3. Praise controllable processes. Emphasize preparation, courage, persistence, decision-making, teamwork, learning, and sportsmanship more than outcome.

4. Support autonomy. As maturity increases, allow the athlete increasing ownership of goals, coach communication, scheduling, and sport decisions.

5. Avoid becoming the second coach. Unless serving formally in that role, allow coaches to manage technical performance and preserve the parent-child relationship.

6. Do not criticize the athlete's body. Avoid teasing, comparisons, comments about being “too heavy,” “too soft,” “too skinny,” or needing to “look like an athlete.”

7. Reduce weight talk generally. Avoid repeatedly discussing your own dieting, body dissatisfaction, calories, “cheat foods,” or fear of weight gain in front of adolescents.

8. Do not praise unhealthy weight loss. Rapid or unexplained weight change in a growing athlete warrants curiosity and potentially professional assessment, not automatic congratulations.

9. Treat food as fuel, nourishment, culture, and enjoyment—not morality. Avoid defining adolescents as “good” or “bad” according to what they eat.

10. Protect recovery. Sleep, rest, school life, friendships, family time, and non-sport identity are parts of athlete development, not obstacles to it.

11. Monitor behavioral changes, not just body weight. Rigidity, secrecy, anxiety around food, compulsive exercise, body checking, fatigue, menstrual disturbance, and social withdrawal can be important early signals.

12. Take menstrual disturbance seriously. Do not normalize persistent menstrual loss or irregularity simply because the adolescent trains hard.

13. Remember male athletes. Disordered eating, compulsive exercise, body dissatisfaction, and RED-S are not female-only problems.

14. Seek help early. Parents do not need diagnostic certainty before consulting appropriately qualified health professionals.

15. Protect the person beyond sport. The successful developmental outcome is not merely a faster runner, stronger lifter, better tennis player, or more successful gymnast. It is a healthy young person capable of carrying physical, psychological, and social well-being into adulthood.

25. Psychological Skills and the Role of the Parent

Parents can also support adaptive psychological skills without becoming amateur therapists.

Emotion labeling is one example. When an adolescent says “I was terrible,” the parent can help differentiate performance judgment from emotional experience: disappointment, embarrassment, anger, fear, frustration, or fatigue.

This can improve emotional specificity and create space between emotion and identity.

Parents can also normalize appropriate performance anxiety:

“Being nervous means this matters to you. You can be nervous and still compete.”

Mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated promising effects in athletes, although youth-specific evidence remains less mature. A systematic review and meta-analysis of elite-athlete randomized trials included 12 trials and 614 athletes. Mindfulness-based programs produced significant pooled improvements in anxiety (Hedges g=-0.87), stress (g=-0.91), and psychological well-being (g=0.96), although heterogeneity was high and certainty was moderate [22].

This supports psychological-skills approaches but does not mean parents should prescribe formal therapy independently. Parents can reinforce breathing, attentional control, routine, self-compassion, and present-focused coping when these are developmentally appropriate and consistent with professional guidance.

26. The Post-Competition Conversation

The period immediately after competition deserves special attention because repeated parental reactions may gradually shape what competition means to the child.

A young athlete who anticipates an angry car journey home may begin competing not simply to win but to avoid parental disappointment.

That changes the emotional meaning of sport.

An alternative sequence is simple:

First establish connection.

Then allow physiological and emotional recovery.

Then listen.

Only later—if the athlete wants it—discuss learning.

A parent does not have to pretend that every performance was excellent.

The more protective message is:

“The result is allowed to be disappointing. You are not a disappointment.”

27. The Parent as a Protective Factor Against Body-Image Pressure

Young athletes encounter body-related information from teammates, coaches, social media, uniforms, spectators, sport culture, and broader society.

Parents cannot eliminate these influences.

They can create a contrasting environment at home.

That environment should minimize body surveillance and maximize body functionality.

The adolescent body should be discussed primarily in terms of what it needs and what it can do: grow, recover, menstruate or mature normally, sleep, concentrate, learn, generate force, tolerate training, repair tissue, and maintain health.

Particularly during puberty, parents should normalize developmental variation.

Two athletes of the same chronological age can differ substantially in biological maturation.

Comparison of body size, muscularity, breast development, body fat, height, or weight between teammates is therefore not only psychologically risky but often developmentally meaningless.

28. Parents, Prevention, and Performance Are Not Opposing Goals

A common concern is that a psychologically protective approach may reduce competitive standards.

The available evidence does not support the assumption that hostility, body criticism, or excessive parental pressure is required for elite performance.

The systematic evidence on motivation instead favors autonomy support, positive relationships, moderate involvement, and task-oriented climates [1].

Psychological safety does not mean absence of ambition.

An athlete can train intensely, pursue national selection, compete internationally, and tolerate difficult feedback while knowing that parental affection is not conditional on the result.

Indeed, this distinction may allow the young person to take greater competitive risks because failure no longer threatens belonging.

29. Eating-Disorder Prevention as Psychological Safeguarding

Traditional sport systems sometimes divide athlete care artificially.

Nutrition belongs to the dietitian.

Mental health belongs to the psychologist.

Training belongs to the coach.

Parenting belongs at home.

The adolescent does not experience these domains separately.

A comment about body weight can simultaneously influence food intake, self-esteem, training behavior, anxiety, family relationships, and energy availability.

Likewise, problematic low energy availability may manifest as fatigue, irritability, declining performance, recurrent injury, food restriction, or psychological distress.

The IOC literature explicitly recognizes interactions between mental health and RED-S [18,19].

Eating-disorder prevention therefore belongs within the central safeguarding architecture of youth sport.

It is simultaneously a mental-health issue, developmental issue, nutrition issue, medical issue, and performance issue.

30. A Parent-Focused Prevention Model

A useful framework can be summarized as five connected parental responsibilities.

Responsibility	Parent behavior	Intended protective function
Connect	Maintain warmth independent of results	Psychological safety
Listen	Ask before advising; validate emotions	Emotional regulation
Protect autonomy	Provide age-appropriate ownership	Intrinsic motivation and competence
Protect the body	Avoid weight stigma and restrictive dieting pressure	Body image and ED prevention
Recognize and refer	Notice changes and obtain qualified help early	Prevention of clinical deterioration

The model deliberately does not ask the parent to optimize every element of performance.

Parental effectiveness should not be measured according to how much technical expertise the parent accumulates.

The parent occupies a different and indispensable role.

31. Important Statistical Findings for Parents and Practitioners

The principal quantitative findings identified in the literature reviewed here are summarized below.

Finding	Study population	Result
Athlete ED/DE prevalence	190 studies; 58,335 athletes	Pooled ED/DE prevalence 20.0% (95% CI 17–23%) [7]
Measurement variation	Athlete meta-analysis	EDE estimate 11.9%; Eating Disorder Inventory estimate 28.3% [7]
Elite youth mental health	Scoping review	DE caseness 0–14% males; 11–41% females across studies [2]
Norwegian adolescent athletes	611 athletes + controls	Estimated ED prevalence 7.0% athletes vs 2.3% controls [9]
Sex difference in same study	Elite athletes	14.0% female athletes vs 3.2% male athletes [9]
Recent prospective high-school study	1,186 baseline participants	ED diagnosis 6.9% male elite/9.3% female elite; between-group differences nonsignificant [10]
Parent-weight comments	218 mother-daughter dyads	Extreme weight-control behavior 4.2% with no comments vs 23.2% with frequent comments [13]
Family weight environment	Adolescent girls	45% reported maternal encouragement to diet; 58% reported family weight teasing [12]
Parent-motivation evidence	29 studies	9,185 young athletes and 2,191 parents reviewed [1]
Specialization and burnout	8 studies; 1,429 athletes	Higher reduced accomplishment, exhaustion and sport devaluation in specializers [6]
Parental pressure/anxiety	420 tennis athletes	Expectations predicted competitive anxiety, B=0.111, p<0.01 [4]
Mindfulness interventions	12 RCTs; 614 elite athletes	Anxiety g=-0.87; stress g=-0.91; well-being g=0.96 [22]

These numbers should be interpreted within their specific study contexts rather than generalized indiscriminately across all sports or adolescents.

32. Limitations of the Current Evidence

Several limitations constrain definitive conclusions.

First, much youth-athlete mental-health and eating-disorder research is cross-sectional, preventing confident causal inference.

Second, female athletes and athletes from European or Western sporting systems have historically been overrepresented.

Third, definitions and measurements of disordered eating differ substantially. Screening questionnaires identify risk or symptoms, not necessarily psychiatric diagnoses.

Fourth, sport-specific environments differ. Weight-category sports, aesthetic sports, endurance sports, team sports, racket sports, and power sports may expose athletes to very different psychosocial pressures.

Fifth, relationships between parents and athletes are bidirectional. A parent's controlling behavior may contribute to athlete distress, but parents may also become more controlling in response to pre-existing distress, risk behavior, or intense sporting demands.

Sixth, not every parent-child interaction associated statistically with eating or psychological outcomes is causal.

For these reasons, this narrative review deliberately avoids labeling particular parenting styles as direct causes of psychiatric illness.

33. Clinical and Ethical Implications

Youth-sport systems should regard parents as part of the athlete-health environment.

Parent education should ideally occur before problems become clinically apparent and should address psychological development, communication after competition, autonomy support, body image, eating-disorder warning signs, RED-S, menstrual health, male presentations, recovery, and appropriate referral pathways.

Coaches and clubs should avoid placing parents in the position of independently managing an athlete's weight.

Likewise, parents should be cautious of performance cultures that normalize rapid weight manipulation, routine dieting, intentional dehydration, public weigh-ins, humiliation regarding body shape, or the belief that menstrual disturbance is evidence of commitment.

In minors, health protection must take priority over short-term performance optimization.

34. Conclusion

Parents have enormous influence in youth sport, but their most important contribution is not producing a particular result.

It is creating the emotional environment in which development occurs.

The scientific literature supports parental approaches characterized by autonomy support, positive parent-child relationships, moderate involvement, understanding, and mastery-oriented values. In contrast, excessive pressure, controlling involvement, and weight-centered communication are associated with several undesirable psychological and behavioral outcomes.

Eating-disorder prevention deserves particular emphasis.

A recent athlete meta-analysis estimated combined eating-disorder/disordered-eating prevalence at approximately 20%, although prevalence varies considerably by assessment technique and athlete population. Youth-specific research demonstrates meaningful risk among both male and female athletes, while parent-weight communication studies identify associations between repeated weight comments and harmful weight-control behavior.

These findings do not justify blaming parents for eating disorders.

They justify educating and empowering parents.

Parents should reduce weight and appearance commentary, avoid dieting pressure and teasing, normalize developmental body change, monitor changes in behavior rather than waiting for severe weight loss, understand that RED-S and eating disorders can affect athletes of any gender, and seek multidisciplinary professional assessment when warning signs appear.

The guiding message for families can therefore be stated simply:

Do not judge the athlete. Support the person.

A competition result may be evaluated.

A mistake may be discussed.

A behavior may require a boundary.

But the young athlete must not learn that body size, selection, ranking, medals, or performance determine their value within the family.

The most protective message a parent can repeatedly communicate is:

“I care about your health, your development, and who you are more than the result.”

That is not the opposite of high performance.

For the developing athlete, it is part of the foundation on which sustainable high performance can be built.

References

1. Gao Z, Chee CS, Norjali Wazir MRW, Wang J, Zheng X, Wang T. The role of parents in the motivation of young athletes: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2024;14:1291711. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1291711. PMID: 38259527.

2. Mental health and well-being of elite youth athletes: a scoping review. PubMed PMID: 39122370.

3. Bois JE, Lalanne J, Delforge C. The influence of parenting practices and parental presence on children's and adolescents' pre-competitive anxiety. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(10):995-1005. doi:10.1080/02640410903062001. PMID: 19847683.

4. Associations between parental expectations and competitive state anxiety in adolescent tennis players: mediation by basic psychological needs. PubMed PMID: 41462854.

5. The mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction in the link between parental expectations and competitive state anxiety among adolescent tennis players. PubMed PMID: 42183512.

6. Giusti NE, Carder SL, Vopat L, Baker J, Tarakemeh A, Vopat B, Mulcahey MK. Comparing burnout in sport-specializing versus sport-sampling adolescent athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(3):2325967120907579. doi:10.1177/2325967120907579. PMID: 32166094.

7. Nasser SN, Martins CB, Cavalcante GM, Marmirolli FADP, Claudino ADM, Fidalgo TM. Prevalence of eating disorders and disordered eating in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2026;60(14):1051-1063. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2025-110678. PMID: 42392846.

8. Marrows M, Grover H, Buckley G, Jeacocke NA, Walton CC. Disordered eating in elite youth athletes: a scoping review of studies published since 2000. JSAMS Plus. 2023;2:100040. PMID: 41868549.

9. Martinsen M, Sundgot-Borgen J. Higher prevalence of eating disorders among adolescent elite athletes than controls. PubMed PMID: 23274604.

10. Factors predicting disordered eating and the prevalence of eating disorders in adolescent elite athletes, trained athletes and a reference group: a prospective controlled two-step study. PubMed PMID: 40097165.

11. Hampshire C, Mahoney B, Davis SK. Parenting styles and disordered eating among youths: a rapid scoping review. Front Psychol. 2022;12:802567. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802567. PMID: 35153924.

12. Neumark-Sztainer D, et al. Family weight talk and dieting: how much do they matter for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors in adolescent girls? J Adolesc Health. 2010;47(3):270-276. PMID: 20708566.

13. Bauer KW, et al. Mother-reported parental weight talk and adolescent girls' emotional health, weight control attempts, and disordered eating behaviors. PMID: 24999423.

14. Dahill LM, Hay P, Morrison NMV, Touyz S, Mitchison D, Bussey K, Mannan H. Associations between parents' body weight/shape comments and disordered eating amongst adolescents over time—a longitudinal study. Nutrients. 2023;15(6):1419. doi:10.3390/nu15061419. PMID: 36986150.

15. Lessard LM, Puhl RM, Foster GD, Cardel MI. Parental communication about body weight and adolescent health: the role of positive and negative weight-related comments. J Pediatr Psychol. 2023;48(8):700-706. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsad040. PMID: 37377019.

16. Hart LM, Cornell C, Damiano SR, Paxton SJ. Parents and prevention: a systematic review of interventions involving parents that aim to prevent body dissatisfaction or eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2015;48(2):157-169. doi:10.1002/eat.22284. PMID: 24796581.

17. Santos EFL, Avelar KPDS, Neufeld CB. Interventions for preventing eating disorders in adolescents: a scoping review. J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2026;37(1):129-159. doi:10.2989/17280583.2026.2649939. PMID: 42012098.

18. Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al. 2023 International Olympic Committee's (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). Br J Sports Med. 2023;57(17):1073-1097. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106994. PMID: 37752011.

19. Intersection of mental health issues and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs): a narrative review by a subgroup of the IOC consensus on REDs. Br J Sports Med. 2023. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106867. PMID: 37752005.

20. Gould RJ, Ridout AJ, Newton JL. Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) in adolescents—a practical review. Int J Sports Med. 2023;44(4):236-246. doi:10.1055/a-1947-3174. PMID: 36122585.

21. Review: questionnaires as measures for low energy availability (LEA) and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) in athletes. PMID: 33789771.

22. Myall K, Montero-Marin J, et al. Effect of mindfulness-based programmes on elite athlete mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2023. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2022-105596. PMID: 36223914.

23. Dave SC, Fisher M. Relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S). Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2022.101242. PMID: 35915044.

24. Torstveit MK, et al. Primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs): a narrative review by a subgroup of the IOC consensus on REDs. Br J Sports Med. 2023. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106932. PMID: 37752004.

25. Hart LM, Damiano SR, Chittleborough P, Paxton SJ, Jorm AF. Parenting to prevent body dissatisfaction and unhealthy eating patterns in preschool children: a Delphi consensus study. Body Image. 2014;11(4):418-425. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.06.010. PMID: 25084034.